2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis on the preadmission use of DPP-4 inhibitors and risk of a fatal or severe course of illness in patients with COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the small number of patients, lack of randomization, and insufficient reporting of secondary outcomes in published studies [ 30 ], several authors have performed meta-analyses. One meta-analysis of six studies (heterogeneity [ I 2 ]: 54%) and another of seven studies ( I 2 : 55%) published in December 2020 and January 2021, respectively, revealed no significant difference in the risk for the development of a fatal or severe course of illness with the use of DPP-4is in patients with COVID-19 [ 31 , 32 ]. Two subsequent meta-analyses with very low heterogeneity, published in February 2021 and March 2021 and included nine and ten studies, respectively, came to similar conclusions [ 33 , 34 ], with the exception of some benefits of in-hospital use of DPP-4is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the small number of patients, lack of randomization, and insufficient reporting of secondary outcomes in published studies [ 30 ], several authors have performed meta-analyses. One meta-analysis of six studies (heterogeneity [ I 2 ]: 54%) and another of seven studies ( I 2 : 55%) published in December 2020 and January 2021, respectively, revealed no significant difference in the risk for the development of a fatal or severe course of illness with the use of DPP-4is in patients with COVID-19 [ 31 , 32 ]. Two subsequent meta-analyses with very low heterogeneity, published in February 2021 and March 2021 and included nine and ten studies, respectively, came to similar conclusions [ 33 , 34 ], with the exception of some benefits of in-hospital use of DPP-4is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we had included only those studies that had reported COVID-19 clinical outcomes in terms of mortality for uniformity. Besides, unlike the hitherto published only meta-analysis reporting preadmission DPP4i use and risk of a fatal or severe course of illness in patients with COVID-19, 38 we have provided pooled analyses of both unadjusted and adjusted ORs, making the results more robust and reproducible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was found in an in-vitro setup that vildagliptin, sitagliptin, or saxagliptin were ineffective in blocking entry of coronavirus into host cells[ 15 ]. In a recently reported study of 1531 patients with COVID-19, it was observed that DPP4-inhibitors produced neither harmful nor beneficial effects and did not support the discontinuation of this class of drugs[ 68 ]. Thus, it is premature to predict the effect of DPP4-inhibitors in COVID-19 patients with DM as most of the published reports were carried out using a small set of patients showing only clinical outcomes; however, molecular aspects should also be verified.…”
Section: Antidiabetic Medication and Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%