2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analytic review of competitive aggressiveness research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The willingness of companies to invest resources in high-risk, high-return projects will have the advantage of increasing resources. Hughes-Morgan et al (2018) and Kljucnikov et al (2016) agree with our conclusion of competitive aggressiveness and state that the organisation that shows aggressive behaviour in the market can compete with their counterparts. Hypotheses H1b and H1d consider two dimensions of EO -i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The willingness of companies to invest resources in high-risk, high-return projects will have the advantage of increasing resources. Hughes-Morgan et al (2018) and Kljucnikov et al (2016) agree with our conclusion of competitive aggressiveness and state that the organisation that shows aggressive behaviour in the market can compete with their counterparts. Hypotheses H1b and H1d consider two dimensions of EO -i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, some studies speculate that there is a relationship between competitive aggressiveness and organisational performance -especially internationally -and this dimension still exists and is considered an active element of EO (Yu et al, 2019;Kuivalainen et al, 2010). In a meta-analysis on competitive aggressiveness with regard to firm performance, Hughes-Morgan, Kolev, and Mcnamara (2018) find that there is a positive correlation among these variables. Another study by Kljucnikov, Belas, and Smrcka (2016) discover that majority of entrepreneurs seeing their behaviour as non-aggressive.…”
Section: Competitive Aggressiveness and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMC model has been the prevalent framework for enriching understanding about CD in general as well as the three widely used dimensions of competitive actions—complexity, heterogeneity, and volume (Chen & Miller, 1994, 2012; Chen et al, 2007; Hughes-Morgan et al, 2018; Uhlenbruck et al, 2017). Given calls to analyze how micro factors, especially corporate governance characteristics, drive competitive actions (Chen & Miller, 2012), we view the AMC model as an appropriate theoretical framework for examining how female board members affect the competitive repertoire of the firm.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although past research has examined various firm and managerial antecedents of competitive actions, it has overlooked the role of board gender composition on these actions. Thus, our study responds to calls for investigation of how gender within the board of directors influences the competitive repertoire of firms (Hughes-Morgan, Kolev, & McNamara, 2018). Employing the “Awareness-Motivation-Capability (AMC)” model that has been widely used in CD analysis (Chen et al, 2007; Hughes-Morgan et al, 2018; Uhlenbruck, Hughes-Morgan, Hitt, Ferrier, & Brymer, 2017), we examine how female board members influence (a) the board’s awareness of competitive actions, (b) the board’s motivation to engage in competitive actions, and (c) the board’s capability to drive competitive actions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation