2014
DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2014.11889691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analytic Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Methods on Statistics Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, this was supported by the study of Charry (2005) in which the small groups solve problems better than the individuals who worked alone. Studies of Lau (2006), Vaughan (2002), Tarim and Akdeniz(2007), Dotson (2001), Kalaian andKasim (2014), andNebesniak (2007) also yielded the same result.…”
Section: Achievement Of the Students In Problem Solvingsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the same way, this was supported by the study of Charry (2005) in which the small groups solve problems better than the individuals who worked alone. Studies of Lau (2006), Vaughan (2002), Tarim and Akdeniz(2007), Dotson (2001), Kalaian andKasim (2014), andNebesniak (2007) also yielded the same result.…”
Section: Achievement Of the Students In Problem Solvingsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This could indicate that too large groups might be ineffective for competition as well. The lack of experimental research (Kalaian & Kasim, 2014 and these multifarious results on competition within different group scenarios underline the need for research with the game attribute number of players (Harteveld, 2010). The outcomes of studies addressing competition might vary vastly between classroom-oriented designs, including a dozen players, smaller groups, or even oneversus-one scenarios.…”
Section: Competing and Learning In Different Group Sizesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For decades, researchers and educators have suggested that splitting students into learning groups in the classroom may lead to several benefits, including better academic performance (e.g., Kalaian & Kasim, 2014). These benefits often appear to be far-reaching: student mood, student attendance, and even faculty attitudes have been shown to demonstrate marked improvements relative to more conventional methods of teaching (e.g., Vernon & Blake, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%