2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-model for Representing Variability in Product Family Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, two studies address separation of concerns, 12,21 another looks at organizing information into a hierarchical structure, 22 and orthogonal variability modeling offers a way to model variability separately from other artifacts. 23 However, no comprehensive solution yet exists.…”
Section: Voice Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two studies address separation of concerns, 12,21 another looks at organizing information into a hierarchical structure, 22 and orthogonal variability modeling offers a way to model variability separately from other artifacts. 23 However, no comprehensive solution yet exists.…”
Section: Voice Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of the widely used domain analysis techniques are Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) [95] and Feature-Oriented Reuse Method (FORM) [96], which use feature models to organize system features into trees of nodes that represent the commonality and variability within a software product line. Another notation is the orthogonal variability model [14,141], which is a graph of variation points and variants.…”
Section: Software Product Line Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variation point model that allows extension of components at pre-specified variation points is proposed in [6]. A conceptual model for capturing variability in a software product line is presented in [4]. All the three only support the notion of variation point and that too only at modeling level whereas we provide support for structural and behavioural levels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%