1976
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.73.2.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metabolic indicator of photoperiodic timing.

Abstract: Characteristics of CO2 output patterns of axenic cultures of Lemna perpusilla are being sought that would serve as biochemically definable indicators of the crucial photoperiodic events during inductive light/dark schedules, using cycles with skeleton main light periods and overall periodicities of 24 hr. As the length of the main light period is increased over the range [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Carbon dioxide output was measured as described earlier, except that 50 ml of medium in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following an extended photoperiod, the timing characteristics were those of an hourglass; this seemed to be due to an effect on the coupling or expression of a single circadian timer during the second and subsequent cycles, rather than to the operation of a different timing mechanism. In addition to the effects on timing, the photoperiod affected the magnitude of the flowering response.The mechanisms which underly the photoperiodic control of flowering and, in particular, the nature of the time-measuring process itself occupied the attention of the late W. S. Hillman throughout his scientific career (8,9,(11)(12)(13)(14). In the control of flowering, as for many other responses, it has been postulated that photoperiodic time measurement involves the circadian clocks that are essentially universal in eukaryotic organisms (4, 23 (5, 6,16, 29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following an extended photoperiod, the timing characteristics were those of an hourglass; this seemed to be due to an effect on the coupling or expression of a single circadian timer during the second and subsequent cycles, rather than to the operation of a different timing mechanism. In addition to the effects on timing, the photoperiod affected the magnitude of the flowering response.The mechanisms which underly the photoperiodic control of flowering and, in particular, the nature of the time-measuring process itself occupied the attention of the late W. S. Hillman throughout his scientific career (8,9,(11)(12)(13)(14). In the control of flowering, as for many other responses, it has been postulated that photoperiodic time measurement involves the circadian clocks that are essentially universal in eukaryotic organisms (4, 23 (5, 6,16, 29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms which underly the photoperiodic control of flowering and, in particular, the nature of the time-measuring process itself occupied the attention of the late W. S. Hillman throughout his scientific career (8,9,(11)(12)(13)(14). In the control of flowering, as for many other responses, it has been postulated that photoperiodic time measurement involves the circadian clocks that are essentially universal in eukaryotic organisms (4,23 Despite the evidence for the involvement of a circadian timer in photoperiodism, there are organisms (for example, the aphid, Megoura, which was studied by Hillman [ 10]) where photoperiodic time measurement seems only to involve an hourglass which begins with the onset of darkness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%