2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Metagenomic Approach to Cyanobacterial Genomics

Abstract: Cyanobacteria, or oxyphotobacteria, are primary producers that establish ecological interactions with a wide variety of organisms. Although their associations with eukaryotes have received most attention, interactions with bacterial and archaeal symbionts have also been occurring for billions of years. Due to these associations, obtaining axenic cultures of cyanobacteria is usually difficult, and most isolation efforts result in unicyanobacterial cultures containing a number of associated microbes, hence compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a microbial community in the HT-58-2 culture presented challenges in obtaining cyanobacterial DNA suitable for genomic sequencing. In this regard, filamentous cyanobacterial genomes are notorious for being difficult to assemble (32). Ultimately, a short growth period in the presence of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), followed by extensive washing of filaments with 10 to 20% DMSO and lysis of the resulting filaments under liquid nitrogen (cell preparation method 2 in Materials and Methods), yielded cyanobacterial genomic DNA that could Tolyporphin-Producing Cyanobacterium-Microbe Community Applied and Environmental Microbiology be assembled from PacBio SMRT cell sequencing reads (finishing and closing details are summarized in Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a microbial community in the HT-58-2 culture presented challenges in obtaining cyanobacterial DNA suitable for genomic sequencing. In this regard, filamentous cyanobacterial genomes are notorious for being difficult to assemble (32). Ultimately, a short growth period in the presence of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), followed by extensive washing of filaments with 10 to 20% DMSO and lysis of the resulting filaments under liquid nitrogen (cell preparation method 2 in Materials and Methods), yielded cyanobacterial genomic DNA that could Tolyporphin-Producing Cyanobacterium-Microbe Community Applied and Environmental Microbiology be assembled from PacBio SMRT cell sequencing reads (finishing and closing details are summarized in Table S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that only 12 (21%) of the sequences were affiliated to the strains of distinct species (M. aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii) provided a great challenge to assign all obtained toxigenic genotypes to certain Microcystis taxa. On the one hand, the low number of affiliations was due to the recent general low availability of genomic sequences from cyanobacteria when compared to other prokaryotes [47]. In the same time, five of the NCBI sequences used in the obtained phylogenetic tree (Figure 9) were based on metagenomic data (genetic material recovered directly from uncultured organisms from environmental samples- [48]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same time, five of the NCBI sequences used in the obtained phylogenetic tree (Figure 9) were based on metagenomic data (genetic material recovered directly from uncultured organisms from environmental samples- [48]). Despite the increased application of these data in modern studies based on the common difficulties, or even impossibility, to culture some cyanobacteria [47], their use in identification work is problematic because of the lack of morphological descriptions for most of the sequenced uncultured strains. The same is the case of most axenic strains with fixed sequences, registered in the NCBI and used for obtaining the phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional classification and studies of cyanobacteria together with algae and plants, as well as the scarcity of qualified professionals to identify and classify taxa, have contributed to underestimation of their diversity and a lack of genetic information (Ribeiro et al, ). For instance, the number of cyanobacterial genomes amounts to approximately 0.6% of all available prokaryotic genomes (Alvarenga, Fiore, & Varani, ). This situation has contributed to a relative lack of attention to other aspects such as the biogeography and phylogeography of cyanobacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%