2020
DOI: 10.1177/2050303219900229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metaphysics for the study of religion: A critical reading of Russell McCutcheon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, as reiterated above, necessarily brings philosophy into the realm of religious studies. This admittance of metaphysical realism may additionally find a home in what has been termed the ‘Critical Study of Religion.’ Although Guénon would likely disagree with some of Kevin Schilbrack's conclusions, the latter, in conversation with Russell McCutcheon, argues that an employment of realist metaphysics 56 in the academy would provide two values: (1) such an inclusion would reverse “the disciplinary isolation of religious studies in the university,” 57 and (2) facilitate identifying the mechanisms which affect human behaviour (Schilbrack, 2020, p. 97). This leaves us with Stace's statement, that “Whether we like it or not, we cannot escape philosophy; because, on whatever road of knowledge we travel, philosophy lies in wait for us with its questions.” 58…”
Section: The Human As Homo Metaphysicusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, as reiterated above, necessarily brings philosophy into the realm of religious studies. This admittance of metaphysical realism may additionally find a home in what has been termed the ‘Critical Study of Religion.’ Although Guénon would likely disagree with some of Kevin Schilbrack's conclusions, the latter, in conversation with Russell McCutcheon, argues that an employment of realist metaphysics 56 in the academy would provide two values: (1) such an inclusion would reverse “the disciplinary isolation of religious studies in the university,” 57 and (2) facilitate identifying the mechanisms which affect human behaviour (Schilbrack, 2020, p. 97). This leaves us with Stace's statement, that “Whether we like it or not, we cannot escape philosophy; because, on whatever road of knowledge we travel, philosophy lies in wait for us with its questions.” 58…”
Section: The Human As Homo Metaphysicusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical scholars of religion reject the theological assumptions of traditional religious studies and attempt to replace the marginalizing and alienating politics of representation in religious studies with representations grounded in a recognition of humans as historical, social, economic, and political beings (McCutcheon 1997, 22-23). In particular, they criticize the use of the label "religion" to describe "the actions of people for whom the term continues to be an alien import" (McCutcheon 2018, 16), suggesting that before the term emerged in the early modern West, people were not naturally or necessarily thinking that they are religious (Schilbrack 2020). They argue religion is an arbitrary concept that originally served specific interests and was subsequently adopted, naturalized, reified, and elevated to an analytic category by scholars of religious studies (Nongbri 2013).…”
Section: The Critical Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fong 2014;Cavanaugh 2016, pp. 187-88;Schilbrack 2020). Though race, for instance, is socially constructed and does not have independent essence, race as a social construction has material impact, systemically and beyond the will of individual actors alone, structuring societies.…”
Section: Religion As a Constructed Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%