Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2002
DOI: 10.1145/508791.508985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for assessing the reusability of object-oriented code using a validated set of automated measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used previously published research that correlates software metrics with the external quality attributes under investigation. The work of Dandashi [35] was used to assess adaptability, maintainability, understandability, and reusability, while that of Bruntink and Deursen [36] was used to assess testability. These two studies were chosen because they had significant correlation levels.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used previously published research that correlates software metrics with the external quality attributes under investigation. The work of Dandashi [35] was used to assess adaptability, maintainability, understandability, and reusability, while that of Bruntink and Deursen [36] was used to assess testability. These two studies were chosen because they had significant correlation levels.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the investigation of the effect of refactoring methods on external quality attributes, we relied on previous studies [36,35] that correlated internal quality metrics and external quality attributes without validating their results. Thus our findings are subject to the significance of the previous correlations.…”
Section: Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they capture important characteristics of object-oriented design: inheritance by (DIT, NOC), coupling by (CBO, RFC, FOUT), size/complexity by (WMC, NOM, LOC) and cohesion by (LCOM). Additionally, they have been used by several previous empirical studies, such as [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] in investigating their correlation with external software quality attributes. In particular, these metrics were investigated by: (i) Dandashi [26], to assess adaptability, completeness, maintainability, understandability and reusability; and (ii) Bruntink and van Deursen [27], to assess testability.…”
Section: Internal Quality Attributes Under Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A product contains components of different composition scales (Jonge 2004). A considerable amount of research has been done to try to characterize reusable (Price and Demurjian 1997;Biggerstaff and Perlis 1989;Briand et al 1994;Card and Glass 1990;Dandashi 2002) and maintainable (Berns 1984;Gibson and Senn 1989;Banker et al 1993) software components. Both reusability and maintainability are related to software dependency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%