2013 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2013.6607491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for calculating the minimum number of cameras in a light field based free viewpoint video system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to LF system evaluation and comparison, by knowing the upper bound of the depth estimation error, optimum system parameters such as camera density , cameras resolution in terms of , and rendering complexity in terms of number of rays employed in interpolation |ω| can be theoretically calculated. For example, in [26], the authors have used the above relationships to obtain the minimum camera density for capturing a scene. We will show in future publications how ESD can be used to optimize the acquisition and rendering parameters of a LF system individually and jointly for a target output video quality.…”
Section: General Case Of Rendering Methods With Depth Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to LF system evaluation and comparison, by knowing the upper bound of the depth estimation error, optimum system parameters such as camera density , cameras resolution in terms of , and rendering complexity in terms of number of rays employed in interpolation |ω| can be theoretically calculated. For example, in [26], the authors have used the above relationships to obtain the minimum camera density for capturing a scene. We will show in future publications how ESD can be used to optimize the acquisition and rendering parameters of a LF system individually and jointly for a target output video quality.…”
Section: General Case Of Rendering Methods With Depth Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes a method to estimate the signal distortion that accounts for both acquisition and rendering. Specifically, this paper  extends the concept of effective sampling density (ESD) proposed by the authors in [25,26] and employs it as an indicator of signal distortion for a LF-based FVV system. Calculation of ESD requires neither a reference/ground truth nor the actual output images/video.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous single-camera models exist (surveyed in [8,9,10]), there are few models describing multi-camera systems [3,11,12,13,14,15,16]. These models describe the spatial relations between cameras, but do not treat camera synchronization error (desynchronization) as a system parameter affecting depth uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESD is defined as the number of rays per unit area of the scene that have been captured by acquisition component and chosen by ray selection process to be employed in the rendering. Not surprisingly, it has been shown that ESD is the true indicator of output quality, not SD ─ except that ESD is fundamentally bound by SD [11,12]. In addition, ESD provides an analytically tractable way for evaluating the influence of the imperfections of both acquisition and rendering components on output quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%