With more unique games than the number of atoms in the universe, chess has always been a mark of human intelligence. However, in the historic moment where world renown, grandmaster Kasparov was defeated by Deep Blue, chess engines have shown their power over human intelligence. This paper examines the impact of computer engines like Deep Blue, StockFish, and AlphaZero on competitive chess, considering their merits and drawbacks in shaping the game's landscape. The analysis reveals that while engines have significantly strengthened chess play, they have also posed challenges to human creativity and strategic thinking. By relying on engine-generated moves, players risk losing their individuality and turning chess into a memorization exercise. However, it is argued that a strategic collaboration between human intellect and computational power can yield optimal results in a technologically advanced chess era. The findings highlight the importance of integrating engine assistance with human cognition, emphasizing the need for players to harness engines as tools rather than substitutes for critical thinking. By utilizing engines for analysis, preparation, and validation of ideas, players can enhance their understanding of the game and explore new possibilities. Moreover, engines have played a crucial role in attracting a wider audience to competitive chess, leading to a rise in participation and an overall elevation in the level of play. Ultimately, the paper asserts that the combination of human intelligence and engine capabilities offers the most promising path for the future of competitive chess.