1981
DOI: 10.1139/f81-132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Comparing the Precision of a Set of Age Determinations

Abstract: An index of average percent error is a better estimate of the precision of age determinations than the conventional percent agreement method because it is not independent of the age of a species.Key words: age determination, aging errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
578
2
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 872 publications
(592 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
578
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Three rings readings were performed for each otolith for the same reader. After this procedure, we performed the consistency analyses among the readings for a given lamina, using the Average Percent Error (APE) (Beamish, Fournier, 1981), where: n = number of otoliths; r i = number of readings for each otolith i; a ij = the number of rings in otolith j in reading i; a i = average age calculated for the otolith i.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three rings readings were performed for each otolith for the same reader. After this procedure, we performed the consistency analyses among the readings for a given lamina, using the Average Percent Error (APE) (Beamish, Fournier, 1981), where: n = number of otoliths; r i = number of readings for each otolith i; a ij = the number of rings in otolith j in reading i; a i = average age calculated for the otolith i.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The precision between two readings was computed using the index Average Percent Error (APE) by Beamish & Fournier (1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the readings was estimated by the IAPE calculation (Index Average Percent Error) by Beamish & Fournier (1981), with two readers conducting consecutive and independent readings. The first reader analyzed the sets of whole and sectioned otoliths three times, and the second reader two times.…”
Section: ___________mentioning
confidence: 99%