1972
DOI: 10.1109/tr.1972.5215997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Computing Complex System Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, there are plethora of methods available that deal with evaluation of these measures yet for most large and complex networks, the path/cutsets‐based SDP techniques have appeared to be simple and efficient as compared to other available techniques. There are several researchers, who have employed path/cutsets for 2 ‐terminal reliability evaluation either using inclusion/‐exclusion or SDP technique assuming either nodes are perfectly reliable or by relaxing this assumption . The evaluation of overall reliability based on the spanning trees of the reliability graph of the network and then expressing this enumeration as a Boolean algebraic statement are suggested by Rai .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, there are plethora of methods available that deal with evaluation of these measures yet for most large and complex networks, the path/cutsets‐based SDP techniques have appeared to be simple and efficient as compared to other available techniques. There are several researchers, who have employed path/cutsets for 2 ‐terminal reliability evaluation either using inclusion/‐exclusion or SDP technique assuming either nodes are perfectly reliable or by relaxing this assumption . The evaluation of overall reliability based on the spanning trees of the reliability graph of the network and then expressing this enumeration as a Boolean algebraic statement are suggested by Rai .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical situation, edges of the network (which may be directed or undirected) are assumed to fail in a statistically independent fashion with known probabilities. For such networks, a variety of probabilistic measures of system performance have been considered: namely, the probability that two given nodes can communicate [11,13,33], that a given node can communicate with a specified portion of the network [6,25], or that every pair of nodes can communicate [8,26,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One class of methods is based on the idea of a path, a minimal set of edges whose operation ensures that the system functions. In this approach, paths must first be enumerated and then combined either by applying the inclusion-exclusion principle or by effecting a partition into mutually disjoint events [2,[13][14][15]17,27]. An alternative approach uses instead the enumeration and combination of cutsets, minimal sets of edges whose failure ensures that the system cannot function [1,11,12,17,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reliability expression using probability theory, Boolean algebra, graph theory, etc. Various techniques exist in the literature to deal with NOTATION the problem of path enumeration in a general network. Some of them [3,4] have used powers of connection ma-k total number of nodes trix to determine the paths. This method requires (k-1) nj node j (j=1 is source) matrix multiplications where k is the number of nodes in b total number of branches the graph.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [3,4] show a 0 X5 X7 1 X8 method to find paths using the connection matrix. The connection matrix is defined as an analytic correspond-Expand (2) in accordance with step 4: ence of the system graph and has a size k x k. An important s = X1X3X6X7X8 u XlX3X6X9 u XlX3X5x8 u XlX3X5X7X9 property of this matrix is: Entry in ninj position of matrix u X1X4X8 u XlX4X7X9 U XlX4X5X6X9 U X2X6X7X8…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%