1990
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90352-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for establishing a five odorant identification confusion matrix task in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent multimodal visual and tactile cues could enable accurate arm choice (e.g., Kraemer et al 1983;M'Harzi andJarrard 1992). The use of the olfactory cues in darkness in our experiment supports previous findings showing the well-developed ability of rats to process olfactory information exhibited in nonspatial tasks (e.g., Staubli et al 1987;Youngentob et al 1990;Slotnick et al 1991;Lu et al 1993). Rats exhibit exceptionally rapid acquisition of operant discriminations when trained with odors (Nigrosh et al 1975;Slotnick 1984) and when olfactory cues outperform visual cues in discrimination problems (Terrace 1963).…”
Section: Different Modes Of Processing Of Olfactory Information Accorsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Independent multimodal visual and tactile cues could enable accurate arm choice (e.g., Kraemer et al 1983;M'Harzi andJarrard 1992). The use of the olfactory cues in darkness in our experiment supports previous findings showing the well-developed ability of rats to process olfactory information exhibited in nonspatial tasks (e.g., Staubli et al 1987;Youngentob et al 1990;Slotnick et al 1991;Lu et al 1993). Rats exhibit exceptionally rapid acquisition of operant discriminations when trained with odors (Nigrosh et al 1975;Slotnick 1984) and when olfactory cues outperform visual cues in discrimination problems (Terrace 1963).…”
Section: Different Modes Of Processing Of Olfactory Information Accorsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is surprising, as rats are known for their well-developed abilities to process olfactory information (e.g., Staubli et al 1987;Youngentob et al 1990;Slotnick et al 1991;Lu et al 1993). Previous experiments concerned with the use of olfactory cues in the eight-arm radial maze demonstrated that even though intramaze olfactory cues could contribute to the complex sensory information enabling accurate performancc (Buresova and Bures 1981), these cues failed to direct arm choice (Olton and Samuelson 1976;Olton and Collison 1979) and were not critical for accurate arm choice (Zoladek and Roberts 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, because both hydrocarbon structure and functional groups have been identified as important structural determinants of bulbar activity patterns (Johnson et al, 2002(Johnson et al, , 2005aLeon and Johnson, 2003), it is not possible to predict, a priori, which odorant pairs would produce the most similar activity patterns. Indeed, as outlined below, the activity patterns evoked by these five odorants overlap in different bulbar locations depending on the different chemical relationships between the compoundsIn this study, we show that 2-DG spatial patterns of odorant-evoked glomerular activity (Johnson & Leon, 2000a,b) accurately predict odorant quality perceptual patterns resulting from an odorant identification confusion matrix task that directly extracts perceptual quality relationships across sets of odorants (Kent et al, , 2003Youngentob et al, 1990Youngentob et al, , 1991Youngentob et al, , 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Over thousands of trials, however, enough errors are committed to permit a rigorous statistical analysis. Individual rats tend to commit the same types of errors, revealing that some odorants are more likely to be misidentified than are others (Youngentob et al, 1990). …”
Section: Odorant Confusion Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between odorant-evoked glomerular responses and odorant-evoked perceptions would be more compelling if one could demonstrate that a quantitative relationship among the patterns evoked by a larger group of unrelated odorants was paralleled by a similar quantitative relationship across their evoked perceptions. To address the comparison of multiple odors in a single experimental protocol, Steven Youngentob developed a five-odorant confusion matrix task in which rats learn to associate each of five different odorants with one of five different tunnels (Youngentob et al, 1990). Rats are given extensive training to identify the correct response tunnels with very few errors.…”
Section: Odorant Confusion Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%