International Powered Lift Conference 1993
DOI: 10.2514/6.1993-4816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for estimating the lift and pitching moment on jet STOVL aircraft hovering in ground effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 that the contributions of the fore-and afterbody parts of the fuselage do not appear to contribute to the suckdown. 15 that the contributions of the fore-and afterbody parts of the fuselage do not appear to contribute to the suckdown.…”
Section: Lift Loss In Hover 31mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 that the contributions of the fore-and afterbody parts of the fuselage do not appear to contribute to the suckdown. 15 that the contributions of the fore-and afterbody parts of the fuselage do not appear to contribute to the suckdown.…”
Section: Lift Loss In Hover 31mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2.28 Typical fountain lift increments induced on three and four jet configurations 15. 2.28 Typical fountain lift increments induced on three and four jet configurations 15.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. 20 show the lateral-velocity and bank-angle excursions in response to a step command input for the 0.1-and 0.4-rad/s systems. The differences in the initial velocity response are dramatic, as are the attitude changes that produce the velocity response.…”
Section: Lateral-velocity Command Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19, these moments are given by the lift loss acting at the center of area. II.A of Chapter 2, the difference between the nose-down moment generated by the suckdown ahead of the jet and the nose-up moment induced aft of the jet.…”
Section: Pitching-moment Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%