2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for evaluating operational implications of regulatory constraints on Arctic shipping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the PC provisions are completed by the 'Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System' (POLARIS) that evaluates vessel operational capacities in different ice conditions as per the ship class (IMO, 2016). As the 'Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System' (AIRSS), POLARIS has a direct impact on the ship's operational evaluation and supports the decision-makers for a safer route (Fedi et al, 2018b) while it also shows some limitations (Bergström et al, 2022;Browne et al, 2022;Lee et al, 2021).…”
Section: Nep Flows Risk Models and Mitigation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, the PC provisions are completed by the 'Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System' (POLARIS) that evaluates vessel operational capacities in different ice conditions as per the ship class (IMO, 2016). As the 'Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System' (AIRSS), POLARIS has a direct impact on the ship's operational evaluation and supports the decision-makers for a safer route (Fedi et al, 2018b) while it also shows some limitations (Bergström et al, 2022;Browne et al, 2022;Lee et al, 2021).…”
Section: Nep Flows Risk Models and Mitigation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type is risk assessment by considering risk probability or empirical formula. The other type adopts a standardized risk quantification framework that combines critical navigation conditions (such as the sea ice index in the sea ice regional navigation system issued by Transport Canada, and the risk index in POLARIS issued by the International Maritime Organization) (Browne et al, 2022).…”
Section: Polar Navigation Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the route planning with ice data of limited resolution, one problem is that there may be only one ice type in a localized area (e.g., Medium First Year Ice less than 1 m thick), and the POLARIS degenerates to the point that the operational risk is evaluated by ice thickness only, while weakening the influence of sea ice concentration, which is obviously not sufficient for route planning for polar cruise ships with finite propulsion power. Such consideration also stems from the apprehension of some captains regarding the results of risk estimates from POLARIS, which permit navigation in hazardous ice areas beyond the ship's capability [13]. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a continuous mapping relationship between various ice conditions and safe speeds based on the propulsion performance of the ship in ice, rather than recommending a single speed limitation for a wide range of ice conditions as POLARIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%