1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb20092.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Increasing the Concentration of a Specific Internal Metabolite in Steady‐State Systems

Abstract: An approach is described by which it is possible to increase the concentration of any internal metabolite without affecting the concentrations of other metabolites and fluxes in the organism. This approach requires the manipulation of only a limited number of enzyme activities. The method shows which enzymes to manipulate and the extent of the manipulation required to achieve a given increase in a chosen metabolite. A case study involving tryptophan overproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisae is given as a pract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some additional restrictions can occur, because the enzyme concentrations calculated according to Eq. (3) must be positive, and for each flux the free-energy gradient (2G) should be negative, unless the flux is coupled to another process with a negative 2G (Kholodenko et al, 1998;Small and Kacser, 1994).…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some additional restrictions can occur, because the enzyme concentrations calculated according to Eq. (3) must be positive, and for each flux the free-energy gradient (2G) should be negative, unless the flux is coupled to another process with a negative 2G (Kholodenko et al, 1998;Small and Kacser, 1994).…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one wishes to increase, e.g., the concentration x 2 while leaving the rest of metabolism unchanged, one should modulate the concentrations of the enzymes directly affected by X 2 (we use capital letters for metabolites and lowercase letters for their concentrations) (Small and Kacser, 1994). In the simplest case, X 2 only interacts with the enzyme that produces it in step 2 and with the enzyme that consumes it in step 3.…”
Section: Two Reactions Catalyzed By a Single Protein In A Linear Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work, automatic linearizations according to basic function approximations for arbitrary kinetic representations are combined with binary variables introduced to remove reactions from the linearized kinetic model. Insightful 'universal' perturbation methods were developed to increase desired concentrations and fluxes within complex networks (Kacser and Acerenza 1993;Small and Kacser 1994). Based on this universal approach, a conception of group flux and concentration control coefficients was introduced and then used for the optimal selection of small subsets of key enzymatic reactions with the maximum impact on the targeted flux (Stephanopoulos and Simpson 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the rate equations and the mass-action ratios, Small and Kacser (1994) devised a method for increasing the concentration of an internal metabolite, leaving other metabolites and the reaction rates unperturbed. However, this method cannot be applied if one wishes to increase any flux, or when the concentrations of some intermediates are constrained by moiety conservation (such as in coenzyme and substrate cycles, see Kholodenko et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ''universal method'' by Kacser and Acerenza (1993), and the engineering of metabolite concentrations by Small and Kacser (1994) and by Westerhoff and Kell (1996) are both special cases of the so-called perturbation method applied to metabolic networks (Kholodenko, 1988(Kholodenko, , 1990(Kholodenko, / 1991). This perturbation method shows how one can modulate the enzyme concentrations so as to obtain any predefined change in metabolic fluxes and concentrations that is compatible with maintenance of a steady state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%