All Days 2010
DOI: 10.2118/129566-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Integrating Response Surfaces into Optimization Models with Real Options: A Case Study in Gas Flooding

Abstract: The goal of a field development optimization process, or workflow, is to investigate various options and determine a course of action that will deliver the largest expected value from an asset. The analysis is often complicated by uncertainty in important inputs. Ideally, operators desire workflows and tools that integrate reservoir engineering and optimization principles in a fast-solving model that can be used to explore the full range of the uncertain inputs. This need is acute in the screening and concept … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dejea [36]has presented a procedure using response surface methodology to manage the uncertainties in production prediction. Purwar [37]has built a workflow for the optimization of the gas flood using response surface methodology. Rezo (2008) study proposed the use of response surface methodology to secure a reliable initial guess for nonlinear inversion and for understanding the separate contributions of the various measurements of the formation tester to specific inversion parameters.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dejea [36]has presented a procedure using response surface methodology to manage the uncertainties in production prediction. Purwar [37]has built a workflow for the optimization of the gas flood using response surface methodology. Rezo (2008) study proposed the use of response surface methodology to secure a reliable initial guess for nonlinear inversion and for understanding the separate contributions of the various measurements of the formation tester to specific inversion parameters.…”
Section: Response Surface Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the more complex the mathematical function the more computational effort is required to obtain a proper function which can accurately describe the system behavior. In petroleum engineering, this technique has been applied in several types of studies such as history matching [1], upscaling geological models [2], field development planning [3], optimization [4], and many other studies. However, the most common area where this methodology has been applied is in uncertainty analysis of a particular process such as oil production [5,6] and CO 2 sequestration [7].…”
Section: Proxy Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area of petroleum engineering, this technique has been applied in several types of studies such as history matching (Slotte and Smorgrav 2008), upscaling geological models (Narayanan, et al 1999), field development planning (Carreras, Turner and Wilkinson 2006), optimization (Purwar, Jablonowski and Nguyen 2010), and many other studies. However, the most common area where this methodology has been applied is in uncertainty analysis of a particular process such as oil production (Ahmed, et al 2013) (Al Salhi, et al 2005 and CO2 sequestration (Yeten, Castellini, et Uncertainty analysis requires identification of the involved uncertain parameters that affect the desired output of a system and evaluation of their degree of influence.…”
Section: Statistics-based or Response Surface Methods (Rsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%