2007
DOI: 10.1149/1.2386929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Measuring Frictional Forces and Shaft Vibrations during Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Abstract: A technique for determining friction forces during chemical mechanical polishing has been developed using a noncontact displacement sensor to measure polishing shaft deflections. Shaft deflections were calibrated to the shear forces acting on the substrate surface allowing in situ measurement of drag force and coefficient of friction ͑COF͒. Power spectrum data of the shaft displacements revealed a broad feature near 70 Hz. The drag force, COF, and shaft vibration intensity vary as a function of slurry, substra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The variation of the coefficient of friction with velocity at low polish pressures is shown in Figure 4. Generally the COF value in the hydrodynamic lubrication regime is expected to be below 0.1, 28 which agrees with our experimental results.…”
Section: Case 1: Hydrodynamic To Partial Lubrication (3 Psi Pressure)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…17 The variation of the coefficient of friction with velocity at low polish pressures is shown in Figure 4. Generally the COF value in the hydrodynamic lubrication regime is expected to be below 0.1, 28 which agrees with our experimental results.…”
Section: Case 1: Hydrodynamic To Partial Lubrication (3 Psi Pressure)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such a correlation is consistent with Carter et al's work where a correlation between shaft vibration intensity and blanket silicon dioxide removal rate using a ceria-based slurry was reported. 26 In our case however, we think the main reason for the observed near-perfect Figure 7. Stribeck+ curves corresponding to silicon dioxide CMP using SIS: (left) for in-situ conditioning reported in Figure 5, (right) for ex-situ conditioning in Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…25 The vibration represents a coupling between the lateral and vertical displacement or tilt of the carrier head and the wafer surface. 26 Figure 3 shows the instantaneous COF (top) and frictional force (bottom) this time using ex-situ conditioning with PA. Every other parameter is kept exactly the same as those in Figure 2. In contrast, several discrete but periodically distributed COF clusters are observed where the total vibration time is much longer than the in-situ case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several methods to determine the coefficient of friction by measuring friction forces using load cell, piezoelectric sensor, tool dynamometer, and non-contact capacitive displacement sensor. [39][40][41][42][43] It is also possible to determine the coefficient of friction between the work and the tool surface by monitoring the variation in the current drawn by the motor driving the tool during polishing of the work surface. 44 As this method is much easier compared to other methods, this work considered the measurement of power drawn by the motor rotating the tool mould.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Ibap Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%