1984
DOI: 10.2307/1911491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
1,635
0
17

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,290 publications
(1,664 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
1,635
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…See, for instance, Sarma and Simpson (2007), Börsch-Supan (1990), Börsch-Supan et al (1992), Pezzin et al (1995) and Hoerger et al (1996). The time-invariant individual effect accounts for unobserved heterogeneity (Heckman and Singer, 1984) in the transition rates not accounted for by the included covariates and assumed to come from a discrete probability distribution with a small number of mass points m .…”
Section: The Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for instance, Sarma and Simpson (2007), Börsch-Supan (1990), Börsch-Supan et al (1992), Pezzin et al (1995) and Hoerger et al (1996). The time-invariant individual effect accounts for unobserved heterogeneity (Heckman and Singer, 1984) in the transition rates not accounted for by the included covariates and assumed to come from a discrete probability distribution with a small number of mass points m .…”
Section: The Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To specify the model to accommodate unobserved heterogeneity, a continuous or finite mixture model specification is required, and instead of specify the distribution of ðy i jx i Þ, the specification of the distribution of ðy i jx i ; u i Þ is required [36] along with the specification of distributional assumptions regarding the random variable u i , which represents the unobserved heterogeneity. If the random variable u i is assumed to be continuous, then a continuous mixture model is specified, conversely, when u i is assumed to be discrete then a semi-parametric finite mixture model (FMM) is specified [35,41]. The finite mixture approach has been used by Deb and Trivedi [35,42] [41] show that estimates of a finite mixture might provide good numerical approximations even when the distribution of u i is continuous; second, provides a natural and intuitively attractive representation of unobserved heterogeneity in a finite, usually small, number of latent classes, each of which may be regarded as a 'type' or 'group [35]'.…”
Section: Econometric Speci¢cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the random variable u i is assumed to be continuous, then a continuous mixture model is specified, conversely, when u i is assumed to be discrete then a semi-parametric finite mixture model (FMM) is specified [35,41]. The finite mixture approach has been used by Deb and Trivedi [35,42] [41] show that estimates of a finite mixture might provide good numerical approximations even when the distribution of u i is continuous; second, provides a natural and intuitively attractive representation of unobserved heterogeneity in a finite, usually small, number of latent classes, each of which may be regarded as a 'type' or 'group [35]'. Moreover, empirical investigation has shown that FMM provide good results [35,36,42,43].…”
Section: Econometric Speci¢cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it can effectively account for unobserved heterogeneity without imposing strong distributional assumptions on the mixing variable (for example, a continuous Gamma distribution assumed in NB model). Laird (1978) and Heckman and Singer (1984) showed that finite mixture models can provide good numerical approximations even if the underlying mixing distribution is continuous (Cameron and Trivedi, 1997). Second, it allows the vector of regression coefficients to vary from component to component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%