2005
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for PID controller tuning using nonlinear control techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section the resulting AVSS performance and the performance of the optimal routines relative to one another will be studied. The objective function has the form presented in equations (27) to (32). The rest of this section will be devoted to describing the algorithms.…”
Section: Evolutionary and Global Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section the resulting AVSS performance and the performance of the optimal routines relative to one another will be studied. The objective function has the form presented in equations (27) to (32). The rest of this section will be devoted to describing the algorithms.…”
Section: Evolutionary and Global Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Stability and robust characteristics are well established for these techniques, but these properties become highly limited when implemented in nonlinear AVSS. 18 Successful application usually depends on availability of good dynamic model of the system and availability of all the states. Implementation of nonlinear techniques like feedback linearization requires guarantee of stable zero dynamics in the system; backstepping requires repeated differentiation of the system's nonlinear function and their implementation practically is usually characterized by chattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general transfer function for a PID controller in Laplace domain can be written as shown in (9) where K P is the proportional gain, K I is the integral gain and K D is the derivative gain [12]. Considering the effect of each term in the PID controller the PID gains were selected through a trial and error approach and were then tuned by simulation with final values of: K P = 0.67, K I = 0.55 and K D = 0.01…”
Section: Pid Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transfer function was then used to analyze the performance of the system and to design proper controllers to meet the design criteria. For the compensator design, the locations of the desired poles were found out from the proposed values of settling time, rise time and percentage overshoot [8,9]. Using root locus, it was found that a lead compensator is required to place poles in the desired locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%