“… 7 , 17 Another modification in the use of a posterior canal wall osteoplastic flap in which, the posterior segment of the EAC is temporarily removed and then the segment is reimplanted into its bed with or without further fixation, such as bone cement or using microplate osteosynthesis. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Of note, biological material has a lower chance of infection, but there are some disadvantages, including atrophy, resorption, curvature, difficulty in fashioning, and donor site morbidity. On the other hand, the advantages of synthetic materials include no atrophy or resorption, or donor site morbidity.…”