2013
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for processing multivariate data in medical studies

Abstract: Traditional displays of principal component analyses lack readability to discriminate between putative clusters of variables or cases. Here the author proposes a method that clusterizes and visualizes variables or cases through principal component analyses thus facilitating their analysis. The method displays pre-determined clusters of variables or cases as urchins that each has a soma (the average point) and spines (the individual variables or cases). Through three examples in the field of neuropsychology, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-distance values >3, as obtained in the model distance plot of the MPM, LC, and BPE groups, indicate a very robust and clear differentiation of both groups from the BPE fluids-group and from each other. [76][77][78] Moreover, Cooman's plot obtained from SIMCA analysis was also used to show the differentiation between two classes and the distance of test samples to their model. Cooman's plot of MPM versus LC and MPM versus BPE models demonstrated the correct classification of tested samples from each group with an average of 96.2% accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-distance values >3, as obtained in the model distance plot of the MPM, LC, and BPE groups, indicate a very robust and clear differentiation of both groups from the BPE fluids-group and from each other. [76][77][78] Moreover, Cooman's plot obtained from SIMCA analysis was also used to show the differentiation between two classes and the distance of test samples to their model. Cooman's plot of MPM versus LC and MPM versus BPE models demonstrated the correct classification of tested samples from each group with an average of 96.2% accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if the number of variables to be corrected increases, the dimension increases and, consequently, the distance between coordinate values increases, which is not suitable for the multi-model under the linear assumption. In this case, the problem can be resolved through dimensionality reduction, which is a method of multivariate analysis [8][9][10] . In a typical multivariable model, if the correlation of the main independent variable with the dependent variable can be presented after adjusting for some covariates, the multivariate analysis can identify the combination of factors that exhibits the greatest correlation with the dependent variable 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%