1998
DOI: 10.1021/ac971055v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Quantitatively Differentiating Crude Natural Extracts Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography−Electrospray Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: This paper describes a method for quantitatively differentiating crude natural extracts using high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS). The method involves performing an HPLC-MS analysis using standard reversed-phase C18 gradient separation on the crude extract. The HPLC system used in this study was a dual-column system designed to optimize throughput. Using image analysis techniques, the data are reduced to a list containing the m/z value and retention time of each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fermentation was carried out as described previously (22). The combined fermentation broth (26 liters) was centrifuged, and the cell mass was extracted twice with 9 VOL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fermentation was carried out as described previously (22). The combined fermentation broth (26 liters) was centrifuged, and the cell mass was extracted twice with 9 VOL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPLC ES-MS. Chemical analysis of solid-phase extraction (SPE) eluates was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC ES-MS) as described by Julian et al (23). Methanolsolubilized analytes (50 l) were separated on a Novapak C 18 analytical column (3.9 by 100 mm) over a 30-min linear gradient from 2% methanol plus 6.5 mM ammonium acetate (pH 5.5) to 95% methanol plus 6.5 mM ammonium acetate (pH 5.5) at a flow rate of 1 ml min Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical analyses of filtered ethanol extracts or of SPE eluates were performed by HPLC-ES-MS as described by Julian et al (23) or by ES-MS as described by Higgs et al (20). A standard mixture consisting of caffeine, m-cresol purple, Spinosad (a mixture of isomeric spinosyn factors A and D; Dow Agrosciences, Indianapolis, Ind.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the many vagaries of biological assays (e.g., nonlinear responses, chemical interference, lack of correlation between bioassay data, and domination of activity outcomes by a few common metabolites), we favor more general chemical analyses to provide data to guide improved expression of secondary metabolites. At present, the best chemical analyses depend on initial separation of natural product extracts (by thin-layer chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) followed by detection of the resolved secondary metabolites by suitable detectors (15,23). However, the benefits of superior resolution resulting from chromatographic separation of natural product extracts are often offset by lower throughput because of the greater time, reagents, and labor necessary for chromatography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%