2004
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2004007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the dynamic management of genetic variability in dairy cattle

Abstract: According to the general approach developed in this paper, dynamic management of genetic variability in selected populations of dairy cattle is carried out for three simultaneous purposes: procreation of young bulls to be further progeny-tested, use of service bulls already selected and approval of recently progeny-tested bulls for use. At each step, the objective is to minimize the average pairwise relationship coefficient in the future population born from programmed matings and the existing population. As a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighted mean lifetime net merit after adjustment to zero using a cost factor of $23 per 1% inbreeding as proposed by Smith et al (1998) was highest at an intermediate level of inbreeding. Colleau et al (2004) applied optimal mating methods for the procreation of young bulls to be progeny-tested, for the use of service bulls on nonelite cows and in a third distinct step for selection of AI bulls among all progeny tested bulls. At each step, the objective was to minimize the average pairwise relationship coefficient applying dynamically rules in a single step.…”
Section: Optimum Genetic Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighted mean lifetime net merit after adjustment to zero using a cost factor of $23 per 1% inbreeding as proposed by Smith et al (1998) was highest at an intermediate level of inbreeding. Colleau et al (2004) applied optimal mating methods for the procreation of young bulls to be progeny-tested, for the use of service bulls on nonelite cows and in a third distinct step for selection of AI bulls among all progeny tested bulls. At each step, the objective was to minimize the average pairwise relationship coefficient applying dynamically rules in a single step.…”
Section: Optimum Genetic Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations imply the implementation of an explicit process of selection, which is in conflict with the general objective of maintaining the highest levels of genetic diversity. Consequently, selection and maintenance of genetic diversity must be balanced to optimise the conservation programme (Colleau et al, 2004;Grundy et al, 1998;Meuwissen, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption was confirmed by stochastic simulation. The optimization of contributions can be implemented using Lagrangian multipliers (Meuwissen and Luo, 1992;Wray and Goddard, 1994;Brisbane and Gibson, 1995;Colleau et al, 2004). This approach has been shown to offer substantial improvements in genetic gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%