1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(96)90022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the separation of GST fusion proteins from co-purifying GroEL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of commonly used nonionic detergents (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 to 0.4% CHAPS, 1% OG), reducing agent (0.2 to 1 mM dithiothreitol), 5 to 10% glycerol, 10 to 15% acetonitrile to the buffer or high salt (500 to 700 mM NaCl) or low or high pH buffers (pH 4.5, pH 8.9, or pH 11) did not result in separation. The methods described in the literature for the removal of GroEL from GST fusion proteins (35,41) also failed in our case. However, we identified a commercial product, B-PER (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL), to be highly effective in releasing GroEL from the affinity columnbound SV fusion proteins (Fig.…”
Section: Expression Of Sv Capsid Proteins In Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The addition of commonly used nonionic detergents (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 to 0.4% CHAPS, 1% OG), reducing agent (0.2 to 1 mM dithiothreitol), 5 to 10% glycerol, 10 to 15% acetonitrile to the buffer or high salt (500 to 700 mM NaCl) or low or high pH buffers (pH 4.5, pH 8.9, or pH 11) did not result in separation. The methods described in the literature for the removal of GroEL from GST fusion proteins (35,41) also failed in our case. However, we identified a commercial product, B-PER (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL), to be highly effective in releasing GroEL from the affinity columnbound SV fusion proteins (Fig.…”
Section: Expression Of Sv Capsid Proteins In Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, attempts to use an engineered E. coli strain (43) (a kind gift from Prof. Ulrich Hartl's laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich, Germany) carrying the GroEL/ES operon under an arabinose-inducible promoter, which allows tuned regulation of the expression levels of these chaperones, failed to produce the hASNase1 protein (data not shown). Ultimately, we managed to remove the co-purified chaperone by including in the washing buffer the natural binding partner of this protein, GroES, at ϳ10-fold excess over GroEL (44). It appears reasonable to assume that the presence of ATP-Mg 2ϩ -GroES weakened the binding between GroEL and hASNase1, thus facilitat-ing their separation upon exhaustive washing (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein was extracted and purified as described previously (29). Copurifying, heat shock bacterial chaperonin GroEL (ϳ65 kDa) was removed from VP5* and VP5*D308A/G309A by using ATP and partner chaperonin GroES (Sigma), as described previously (52). As complete removal of GroEL rendered VP5* insoluble, GroEL was not removed from VP5* for further experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%