1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of calibrating an automatic multiprobe measurement line

Abstract: A new method is proposed for determining the relative transfer coefficients of the sensors in a standing-wave analyzer based on a multiprobe measurement line, which is used with loads whose parameters are known only subject to some error. The method is based on the exact solution of the long-line equations obtained by the maximum-likelihood method.Standing-wave analyzers based on multiprobe measurement lines are widely used to automate measurements on UHF circuit parameters [1--4]. The measurements involve ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal advantage of the arrangement is its simplicity, since three fixed detector probes placed along the transmission line can replace typical alternative arrangements of directional couplers and bridges. A variety of different methods for determining the calibration constants of the system have been reported [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The researchers so far have made various assumptions in determining the calibration constants, such as neglecting line losses, dispersion in the line, loading effects of the probes and inexact positioning of the detection probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principal advantage of the arrangement is its simplicity, since three fixed detector probes placed along the transmission line can replace typical alternative arrangements of directional couplers and bridges. A variety of different methods for determining the calibration constants of the system have been reported [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The researchers so far have made various assumptions in determining the calibration constants, such as neglecting line losses, dispersion in the line, loading effects of the probes and inexact positioning of the detection probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering V+e i = Vq, and a phase error term e for 0 each probe, equation (1) will become: V=V F I+F e;e S e(VaiE i ;i = tZ23 (2) Where (t -2,/k) corresponds to the detection probe location from the load with some unknown phase error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%