1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01243548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of integral sampling of rock masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recovery of drilled core tends to be much better in blocks than in matrix because the blocks survive the drilling process, whereas the weak matrix generally does not (Riedmüller et al, 2001). Good core recovery has been reported by using triple-tube core barrels (Roadifer et al, 2009), and the Integral Method (Rocha, 1971). Downhole optical and geophysical techniques (such as borehole televiewers) provide rock mass information of the walls of the drilled holes, and are particularly useful when core recovery is poor.…”
Section: Geopractice Methods For Characterization Of Mélangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery of drilled core tends to be much better in blocks than in matrix because the blocks survive the drilling process, whereas the weak matrix generally does not (Riedmüller et al, 2001). Good core recovery has been reported by using triple-tube core barrels (Roadifer et al, 2009), and the Integral Method (Rocha, 1971). Downhole optical and geophysical techniques (such as borehole televiewers) provide rock mass information of the walls of the drilled holes, and are particularly useful when core recovery is poor.…”
Section: Geopractice Methods For Characterization Of Mélangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percolation of pore fluids has major effects on the stability, and subsurface flow regimes can be complex. In addition, natural events, such as rainfall and earthquakes, and manmade factors, such as blasting, can serve as triggers to slope instabilities (Hoek et al 2005;Singh and Goel 2011;Bronniman 2011;Miranda and Sousa 2012;Rocha 2013;Sanei et al 2015;Karam et al 2015;Sousa et al 2020). Rock mass strength parameters can be determined by in-situ and laboratory tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-situ tests are shearing along discontinuities, in fault filling materials and along other low strength surfaces. Laboratory tests for intact rocks and for discontinuities are very important (Rocha, 2013;Hencher and Richards 2015;Sousa et al, 2020). Empirical systems provide guidelines to estimate rock strength parameters in slopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of claystone has been extensively conducted by numerous scholars since the 1970s. Typically, these materials, known as hard soil and soft rock, are classified based on their uniaxial compressive strength [1][2][3]. A large number of field investigations, geotechnical tests, and engineering construction practices have consistently demonstrated that hard soil and soft rock exhibit characteristics such as expansion and contraction, multiple fractures, and overconsolidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%