1983
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/37.3.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults

Abstract: A variety of studies has a need to estimate the amount and pattern of daily energy expenditure. To this end, a 3-day activity record was developed and is described. Every 15-min period over 3 days, including a weekend day, was qualified in terms of energy cost on a 1 to 9 scale corresponding to a range of 1.0 MET to 7.8 METs and higher. A reliability study of 61 subjects indicated a highly reproducible procedure as shown by an intraclass correlation of 0.96 for mean kcal of energy expenditure over 3 days. Repe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
540
1
35

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 736 publications
(588 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
12
540
1
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows MET values used in these three studies. The MET values used in the studies by Bouchard et al (22) and Ekelund et al (24) are similar. However, the MET values used by Bratteby et al (23) are higher in categories 7-9 than in the other two studies.…”
Section: Activity Diarysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Table 1 shows MET values used in these three studies. The MET values used in the studies by Bouchard et al (22) and Ekelund et al (24) are similar. However, the MET values used by Bratteby et al (23) are higher in categories 7-9 than in the other two studies.…”
Section: Activity Diarysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Pilot studies were used to trial the modified 7-day recall interview (Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey, 1992), a 3-day activity diary (Bouchard, 1983) and the accelerometer. After preliminary trials, a 3-day activity diary was considered unacceptable by the participants due to the disruption caused to normal routines by doing this on a repeated basis and the inability to complete diaries during work hours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first group, the PAL was derived by dividing total DEE by SMR extrapolated over 24 h. For the purpose of comparison with estimated BMR, SMR was considered as a surrogate for BMR and is abbreviated as MBMR. In the second group of active subjects, the PAL was derived by the utilization of a 3-day activity record (Bouchard et al, 1983). This diary was designed to estimate overall PAL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%