2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2979290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Construct Early-Warning and Emergency Response System for Sulfur Hexafluoride Leakage in Substations

Abstract: Sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6) gas leakage in populous urban areas, once occurring, can cause death from suffocation if its concentration largely exceeds 1000ppm and oxygen concentration is low than 19 vol-%. Leakage that cannot be detected and responded to with prompt and effective measures can even lead to large death tolls. Presently, few systematic technical approaches to monitoring, early-warning, consequence prediction, and emergency response of SF 6 leakage have been reported. In this paper, a method for co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7.9, 0.1, 1.5 17 6, 9.9, 1.5 27 7.9, 5, 0.1 37 7.9, 2.5, 0.1 8 7.9, 5, 1.5 18 7.9, 2.5, 1.5 28 7.9, 9.9, 0.1 38 7.9, 7.5, 0.1 9 7.9, 9.9, 1.5 19 7.9, 7.5, 1. Based on the method for determining the sensor points reported in a previously published article [2], the simulation results were used to determine that when a leak occurred at point 1, the sulfur hexafluoride gas concentration first exceeded 1000 ppm at monitoring points 8 and 27 seven times, which was more often than the times that it first exceeded this limit at the other points . When a leak occurred at point 2, the sulfur hexafluoride gas concentration first exceeded 1000 ppm at monitoring points 24 and 32 eight times, which was more often than the times that it first exceeded this limit at the other points .…”
Section: Optimal Sensor Settings 1) Explanation Of Optimal Sensor Setting Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7.9, 0.1, 1.5 17 6, 9.9, 1.5 27 7.9, 5, 0.1 37 7.9, 2.5, 0.1 8 7.9, 5, 1.5 18 7.9, 2.5, 1.5 28 7.9, 9.9, 0.1 38 7.9, 7.5, 0.1 9 7.9, 9.9, 1.5 19 7.9, 7.5, 1. Based on the method for determining the sensor points reported in a previously published article [2], the simulation results were used to determine that when a leak occurred at point 1, the sulfur hexafluoride gas concentration first exceeded 1000 ppm at monitoring points 8 and 27 seven times, which was more often than the times that it first exceeded this limit at the other points . When a leak occurred at point 2, the sulfur hexafluoride gas concentration first exceeded 1000 ppm at monitoring points 24 and 32 eight times, which was more often than the times that it first exceeded this limit at the other points .…”
Section: Optimal Sensor Settings 1) Explanation Of Optimal Sensor Setting Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the method used for the model in a previously published article [2], a gas leakage monitoring and earlywarning model could be established through regressing and fitting the simulated data [12]- [17], in which the gas leakage orifice diameter was x, leakage time was y, and sulfur hexafluoride gas concentration was z. Table 2 shows the model of monitoring point 24 for a leak occurring at point 1 [2]. The concentration values could be acquired by substituting different values for the gas leakage orifice diameter and leakage time into the model.…”
Section: Gas Leakage Monitoring and Early-warning Model 1) Building The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation