2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Correlate mRNA Expression Datasets Obtained from Fresh Frozen and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples: A Matter of Thresholds

Abstract: BackgroundGene expression profiling of tumors is a successful tool for the discovery of new cancer biomarkers and potential targets for the development of new therapeutic strategies. Reliable profiling is preferably performed on fresh frozen (FF) tissues in which the quality of nucleic acids is better preserved than in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material. However, since snap-freezing of biopsy materials is often not part of daily routine in pathology laboratories, one may have to rely on archival … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WG-DASL assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions with an input of 500 ng total RNA. To monitor the assay performance and to evaluate the inter-assay BeadChip variability between the experiments, an inner-assay control consisting of 500 ng total RNA pooled from RNA isolated from several cultured breast cancer cell lines was used in each experiment [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WG-DASL assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions with an input of 500 ng total RNA. To monitor the assay performance and to evaluate the inter-assay BeadChip variability between the experiments, an inner-assay control consisting of 500 ng total RNA pooled from RNA isolated from several cultured breast cancer cell lines was used in each experiment [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 52 patients matched formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue from the primary tumor with at least 30% invasive tumor cells was available (median [range]; 60% [30%–85%]). RNA from the FFPE samples was isolated with the High‐Pure RNA Paraffin Kit (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) and the quality and quantity of the RNA was checked with the Nanodrop 1,000‐v.3.7 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington), the MultiNA Microchip Electrophoresis system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and three reference genes ( GUSB, HMBS and HPRT1 ) as described before …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA from the FFPE samples was isolated with the High-Pure RNA Paraffin Kit (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) and the quality and quantity of the RNA was checked with the Nanodrop 1,000-v.3.7 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington), the MultiNA Microchip Electrophoresis system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and three reference genes (GUSB, HMBS and HPRT1) as described before. 24 Normalization and AR cut-off Expression levels of the 93 genes in the CTC and tumor samples were normalized by the average C q value of three reference genes (ΔC q ). If the average C q value of the reference genes (GUSB, HMBS and HPRT1) was >27.5 in a sample, this sample was considered to have insufficient RNA quantity and/or quality.…”
Section: Sample Processing For Gene Expression Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following isolation, RNA was stored in RNase/DNase‐free water at −80 °C. Quality control was performed as previously described (Mustafa et al., 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following paraffin removal with xylene the high-pure RNA paraffin kit was used according the supplier's instructions (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Following isolation, RNA was stored in RNase/ DNase-free water at À80 C. Quality control was performed as previously described (Mustafa et al, 2015).…”
Section: Rna Extraction and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%