2021
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.667163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Deal With Inter-regional and Inter-provincial Transaction Settlement Deviation Quantity Based on Kernel Density–Entropy Weight

Abstract: The mismatch between energy distribution and power load in China can be alleviated by inter-regional and inter-provincial power transactions. However, it also brings challenges to transaction settlement. In the new round of electric power reform, the transaction settlement deviation quantity needs to be more standardized. Based on the analysis of the related work, this article used the analytical framework of the analytic hierarchy process to calculate the transaction type weight, the inter-regional, and the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the management and treatment of DE, Wang et al employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process to quantify DE from aspects such as transaction type weight and inter-regional, inter-provincial weight [8]. They established a DE responsibility judgment mechanism and a deviation accounting model, clarifying the responsibility for DE across regions and provinces, as well as the deviation volume that trading entities should bear.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the management and treatment of DE, Wang et al employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process to quantify DE from aspects such as transaction type weight and inter-regional, inter-provincial weight [8]. They established a DE responsibility judgment mechanism and a deviation accounting model, clarifying the responsibility for DE across regions and provinces, as well as the deviation volume that trading entities should bear.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%