2016
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to decipher pleiotropy by detecting underlying heterogeneity driven by hidden subgroups applied to autoimmune and neuropsychiatric diseases

Abstract: There is growing evidence of shared risk alleles between complex traits (pleiotropy), including autoimmune and neuropsychiatric diseases. This might be due to sharing between all individuals (whole-group pleiotropy), or a subset of individuals within a genetically heterogeneous cohort (subgroup heterogeneity). BUHMBOX is a well-powered statistic distinguishing between these two situations using genotype data. We observed a shared genetic basis between 11 autoimmune diseases and type 1 diabetes (T1D, p<10−4), a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using BUHMBOX21, a tool that distinguishes true genetic relationships between diseases (pleiotropy) from spurious relationships resulting from heterogeneous mixing of disease cohorts, we determined that misdiagnosed cases in the schizophrenia cohort (for example, young-onset FTD–ALS) did not drive the genetic correlation estimate between ALS and schizophrenia ( P =0.94). Assuming a true genetic correlation of 0%, we estimated the required rate of misdiagnosis of ALS as schizophrenia to be 4.86% (2.47–7.13) to obtain the genetic correlation estimate of 14.3% (7.05–21.6; Supplementary Table 7), which we consider to be too high to be likely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using BUHMBOX21, a tool that distinguishes true genetic relationships between diseases (pleiotropy) from spurious relationships resulting from heterogeneous mixing of disease cohorts, we determined that misdiagnosed cases in the schizophrenia cohort (for example, young-onset FTD–ALS) did not drive the genetic correlation estimate between ALS and schizophrenia ( P =0.94). Assuming a true genetic correlation of 0%, we estimated the required rate of misdiagnosis of ALS as schizophrenia to be 4.86% (2.47–7.13) to obtain the genetic correlation estimate of 14.3% (7.05–21.6; Supplementary Table 7), which we consider to be too high to be likely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To distinguish the contribution of misdiagnosis from true genetic pleiotropy we used BUHMBOX21 with 417 independent ALS risk alleles in a sample of 27,647 schizophrenia patients for which individual-level genotype data were available. We also estimated the required misdiagnosis rate M of FTD–ALS as schizophrenia that would lead to the observed genetic correlation estimate as C /( C +1), where C = ρ g N SCZ / N ALS and N SCZ and N ALS are the number of cases in the schizophrenia and ALS datasets, respectively37 (derived in Supplementary Methods 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Breaking Up Heterogeneous Mixture Based On cross(X)-locus correlations (BUHMBOX) analysis 71 was used to test whether the genetic correlation between persistent ADHD and ADHD in childhood was driven by subgroup heterogeneity, found when there is a subset of children enriched for persistent ADHD-associated alleles. Subgroup heterogeneity was tested in each childhood dataset considering two different SNP sets from the GWAS-MA of persistent ADHD, with P-value thresholds of P<5.00E-05 (62 LD-independent SNPs) and P<1.00E-03 (710 LDindependent SNPs).…”
Section: Buhmbox Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the simpler problem of detecting the presence of genetic heterogeneity seems to be more tractable [112], as is the task of detecting sub-groups by combining both genetic and non-genetic data. These nongenetic data could include traditional phenotypes, for example environmental covariates, or molecular phenotypes such as gene expression, DNA methylation, or other epigenetic modifications.…”
Section: Genetic Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of combinations of risk loci, their small effect sizes, the uncertainty about the size or even about the presence of genetically heterogeneous groups, and the challenging disentanglement from population stratification all contribute to the difficulty of this problem. [112].…”
Section: Detection Of Genetic Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%