2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Evaluate Genome-Wide Methylation in Archival Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Ovarian Epithelial Cells

Abstract: BackgroundThe use of DNA from archival formalin and paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue for genetic and epigenetic analyses may be problematic, since the DNA is often degraded and only limited amounts may be available. Thus, it is currently not known whether genome-wide methylation can be reliably assessed in DNA from archival FFPE tissue.Methodology/Principal FindingsOvarian tissues, which were obtained and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded in either 1999 or 2011, were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to DNA degradation and fragmentation, the mapping rates for FFPE samples are lower than those that would be expected from fresh tissue or cell line material. For example, a previous genome-wide evaluation of FFPE material reported unique mapping rates of 7.0% to 19.9% [ 16 ]. Following the protocol described here, we obtained a unique mapping efficiency of 35–40% (Data S1 and S2 in Additional file 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to DNA degradation and fragmentation, the mapping rates for FFPE samples are lower than those that would be expected from fresh tissue or cell line material. For example, a previous genome-wide evaluation of FFPE material reported unique mapping rates of 7.0% to 19.9% [ 16 ]. Following the protocol described here, we obtained a unique mapping efficiency of 35–40% (Data S1 and S2 in Additional file 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nested PCRs used to amplify the E2BS1 and E2BS2,3,4/Sp1 binding sites were more sensitive than the primary PCRs alone, allowing methylation analysis in more than 80% of the samples. This higher level of detection may be in part due to the double amplification round, the smaller amplified product generated in the nested PCRs compared to the amplified products of the primary PCRs, and to a potential increase in efficiency of PCR amplification during the nested PCRs due to increased dilution of possible PCR inhibitors [ 31 32 ]. Reports from other researchers have indicated limited success analysing HPV methylation using LCM tissues, due to limited sensitivity of the assays used [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slides were dried in an incubator at 37°C for 3 hours. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed as discussed elsewhere [ 48 ]. Briefly, the slides were rehydrated, stained, and dehydrated, followed by drying for 1 hour at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%