2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to quantify viable carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacteria in treated and untreated wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the loss of plasmids between phenotypic resistance testing and the sequencing of the isolates cannot be fully excluded. Other studies demonstrated an increased load of multiple resistant 3GCREC and even carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in WWTPs [6,43,44]. However, carbapenemase genes could not be detected in any isolate used in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Also, the loss of plasmids between phenotypic resistance testing and the sequencing of the isolates cannot be fully excluded. Other studies demonstrated an increased load of multiple resistant 3GCREC and even carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in WWTPs [6,43,44]. However, carbapenemase genes could not be detected in any isolate used in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Acquisition of MDR genes occurs most commonly in hospitals and chronic care facilities, but community-acquired sources including wild and domestic animals, food products, and environmental contamination may drive resistance 5,10,50,93,94 . Spread of MDR genes has also been linked to community and hospital effluent treatment systems 95,96 . Movement of humans, wild or domestic animals, livestock and food products is a key factor in spreading MDR in the environment 93,94,[97][98][99] .…”
Section: International Dissemination Of Antimicrobial Resistant Genetic Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the bacterial numbers were high in the raw wastewater samples, the ratios of presumptive CRE to total Enterobacterales were below 0.02%. The ratio of CRE numbers to the heterotrophic plate count numbers was reported to be approximately 10 −4 (0.01%) to 10 −5 (0.001%) for wastewater samples in previous studies [ 10 , 18 ]. In our previous study, the ratios of presumptive CRE were observed between 0.014 and 0.31% using slightly different isolation methods from those in this study [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The concentration of meropenem added to the medium was set at 0.5 μg/mL in this study, which was lower than the breakpoints provided by CLSI and EUCAST. The reason for the lower concentration was to select more presumptive colonies based on our previous results [ 20 ] so that CRE would be selected by the confirmation test from the presumptive colonies [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation