A Methodological Approach for Assessing Amplified Reflection Distributed Denial of Service on the Internet of Things

Abstract

Concerns about security on Internet of Things (IoT) cover data privacy and integrity, access control, and availability. IoT abuse in distributed denial of service attacks is a major issue, as typical IoT devices’ limited computing, communications, and power resources are prioritized in implementing functionality rather than security features. Incidents involving attacks have been reported, but without clear characterization and evaluation of threats and impacts. The main purpose of this work is to methodically assess the possible impacts of a specific class–amplified reflection distributed denial of service attacks (AR-DDoS)–against IoT. The novel approach used to empirically examine the threat represented by running the attack over a controlled environment, with IoT devices, considered the perspective of an attacker. The methodology used in tests includes that perspective, and actively prospects vulnerabilities in computer systems. This methodology defines standardized procedures for tool-independent vulnerability assessment based on strategy, and the decision flows during execution of penetration tests (pentests). After validation in different scenarios, the methodology was applied in amplified reflection distributed denial of service (AR-DDoS) attack threat assessment. Results show that, according to attack intensity, AR-DDoS saturates reflector infrastructure. Therefore, concerns about AR-DDoS are founded, but expected impact on abused IoT infrastructure and devices will be possibly as hard as on final victims.

A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Cybersecurity in Mobile Networks

“…Denial of Service (DoS): In this class of attacks, malicious users cripple the services offered by a site, for example by flooding a site with many requests [114]. In this way, they limit or deny the system services to legitimate users.…”

A Survey of Security Vulnerability Analysis, Discovery, Detection, and Mitigation on IoT Devices

“…Security on the protocol level is not involved. For example, the abuse of IoT communication protocols and the AR-DDoS [37] attack is performed by the IoT communication protocols Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) [38], SSDP [39], and SNMP. Its target is not the flaws of IoT devices.…”

Enabling Secure XMPP Communications in Federated IoT Clouds Through XEP 0027 and SAML/SASL SSO

“…In particular, authors focus on how to optimize the key thresholds for estimating the channel gain in Channel-Aware Encryption (CAE). In [ 24 ], authors methodically assess the possible impacts of a specific class of Amplified Reflection Distributed Denial of Service (AR-DDoS) attacks against IoT. In [ 25 ] authors propose a protocol designed for multi-hop communications between Device-to-Device (D2D)-enabled terminals equipped with light-weight security mechanisms.…”