ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2005.1513807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodological approach relating the classification of gesture to identification of human intent in the context of human-robot interaction

Abstract: In order to infer intent from gesture, a broad classification of types of gestures into five main classes is introduced. The classification is intended as a generally applicable basis for incorporating the understanding of gesture into human-robot interaction (HRI). Examples from human-robot interaction show the need to take into account not only the kinematics of gesture, but also the interactional context. Requirements for the operational classification of gesture by a robot interacting with humans are sugge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From as early as 14 months of age, humans communicate cooperatively, to inform others of things and to share interest [1]. Nehaniv [2] refers to these gestures as interactional, used to "regulate interaction with a partner, i.e. used to initiate, maintain, invite, synchronize, organize or terminate a particular interactive, cooperative behavior."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From as early as 14 months of age, humans communicate cooperatively, to inform others of things and to share interest [1]. Nehaniv [2] refers to these gestures as interactional, used to "regulate interaction with a partner, i.e. used to initiate, maintain, invite, synchronize, organize or terminate a particular interactive, cooperative behavior."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our studies also clearly suggest an interaction between the type of task and the type of gestures produced. This point stresses the importance of knowing the context in which gestures are produced and the interaction history [15]. Comparing the results from both studies, what seems more salient is the willingness of people to engage in interactions with the robot even if the trigger for such is just a 'small' acknowledgement of their actions.…”
Section: B General Discussion Of the Results From The User Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The conceptual framework presented in [15] was adapted to capture requirements for contextual interpretation of body postures and human activities for purposes of HRI. It defines five functional classes of gestures:…”
Section: B General Discussion Of the Results From The User Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coding scheme utilized here to classify the observed gestures is in line with the multi-functional classification system proposed by Nehaniv et al [7]. The coding scheme has been developed, validated and successfully used in other studies [see, 8,9].…”
Section: G the Coding Schemementioning
confidence: 99%