2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At the local scale, the analysis provides a more accurate assessment by identifying the most strategic cropland patches in the corridors for improving connectivity, which is based on the patch addition process developed by Foltête et al (2014) that identifies the best locations for new habitat patches. The process begins by computing a global metric that quantifies the connectivity of the initial network and then each cropland patch in the corridors is considered a new habitat patch, and the metric is computed again.…”
Section: Protocol For Evaluating the Effect Of Potential Reforestatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the local scale, the analysis provides a more accurate assessment by identifying the most strategic cropland patches in the corridors for improving connectivity, which is based on the patch addition process developed by Foltête et al (2014) that identifies the best locations for new habitat patches. The process begins by computing a global metric that quantifies the connectivity of the initial network and then each cropland patch in the corridors is considered a new habitat patch, and the metric is computed again.…”
Section: Protocol For Evaluating the Effect Of Potential Reforestatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c) (Table 3). The magnitude and percentage difference between these metrics can be used to assess the sensitivity of connectivity to the different scenarios (J.-C. Foltête et al, 2014;García-Feced, Saura, & Elena-Rosselló, 2011). Least-cost path analysis provides no indication of redundancy or potential alternative routes.…”
Section: Connectivity Modelling Scenario Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The impact of different scenarios can be visualised qualitatively, as well as quantified using metrics such as patch-scale graph metrics, and landscape scale graph metrics (Clauzel, Girardet, & Foltête, 2013;J.-C. Foltête, Girardet, & Clauzel, 2014;Zetterberg, Mörtberg, & Balfors, 2010). The scale of impact assessment for land use planning ranges from regional assessments that identify critical wildlife corridors linking a region to local scale assessments such as for an environmental impact assessment that identify whether remnant vegetation found as paddock trees are critical for connecting two habitat patches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of the best locations for potential wildlife crossings was based on a cumulative method developed by Foltête et al (2014) and Girardet et al (2016). The method consisted of testing each graph link crossed by the HSR line and to validate the one maximizing the global connectivity of the tree frog network.…”
Section: Landscape Graph Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the global metric PC, a patch-based metric was derived, the PC flux (Foltête et al 2014), which is the contribution of each patch to the global PC index. For a given patch j, PC flux(j) is given by:…”
Section: Landscape Graph Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%