A Methodological Framework to Study Change in Team Cognition Under the Dynamical Hypothesis

Abstract

The dynamical hypothesis claims that cognitive systems, such as teams, are dynamical systems (i.e., an interdependent collection of individuals and their technology that change together over time). Following this hypothesis, team researchers have adopted dynamical approaches to gain a better understanding of the team cognitive processes and states that form team cognition as well as how they emerge and unfold over time. One such approach focuses on team coordination dynamics, which examines the coupling of signals between interacting individuals in various modalities, and has been shown to reflect important properties of team functioning including team cognition. However, how changes in team coordination relate to high-level team cognitive processes and states, as well as important events, are not yet fully understood. To this end, we advance a methodological framework for researching team cognition under the dynamical hypothesis by integrating a team coordination dynamics research framework with concomitant methodologies. Subsequently, we provided an empirical application of this framework. Thereby, this work contributes methodologically and empirically to a deeper understanding of team cognition, the dynamical hypothesis, and the synergy between them.

Exploring objective measures for assessing team performance in healthcare: an interview study

“…In the majority of these papers, team performance has been inferred using 1-2 measures, although the use of multiple modalities in one measurement would likely add value to the evaluation of team performance (Hałgas et al, 2022). Moreover, most of the existing studies that have attempted to assess team performance using physiological data have focused on simple tasks that may not be directly relevant to medical procedures, and have been conducted under conditions of low movement, which may mask potential artifacts (Stuldreher et al, 2023;van Eijndhoven et al, 2023). Therefore, it is crucial to address these limitations and ensure that future studies properly account for movement and stress artifacts to ensure the validity of performance evaluations.…”