A Methodology for Assessing Organizational Core Values*

Abstract

 The goal of this study is to offer a methodology for empirically assessing the core values of an organization. It uses means-end analysis in order to determine those values that organization members manifest in their daily behaviour, and which are not just espoused 'truisms'. The method is based on the sense members of an organization make of what they do. Sensemaking follows a means-end pattern, through which individual actions converge into central values. The values most central in this means-end structure are the core values that effectively motivate organization members in their job. Our method works in two steps: first, exploratory interviews using the laddering-technique establish the values potentially most central to the organization; then, a follow-up survey assesses the complete pattern of means-end relations among the potential values. Validity tests show that the most central values derived from this survey data are the most important to organization members. These values are also the most stable over time. We make a comparison of this method with traditional value surveys and we discuss its implications for the study of organizational behaviour.

Developing marketing capabilities for customer value creation through Marketing–Sales integration

“…Thompson & Chen, 1998;Van Rekom et al, 2006), we decided to present both the complete HVM and the dominant chains separately. The complete HVM is drawn for purposes of analysis.…”

Not your problem? Exploring the relationship between problem formulation and social responsibility

“…As a proxy for this, we shed light on the expressed values of the two organizations, even though we are aware that expressed values may diverge from actual values (cf. Argyris & Schön 1974;van Rekom 2006). Values can be seen as expressions of both what is desirable and what is worthy of protection, which means that values indicate the moral constraints that organizations place on their activities.…”

Managing membership threats through collective efficacy

“…However, identity features may be of a more general scope than concrete incident situations or distinctions emerging in a Kelly grid or critical incident episode situation. Therefore, in the spirit of the laddering technique (Reynolds and Gutman, 1984;van Rekom et al, 2006), participants respond to prompts regarding why the identified features matter to them, which helps establish the underlying dimensions of the organization's identity according to interviewees. The approach requires that interviewees explain their reasons many times; thus, they themselves synthesize what they are saying and name the features of their organization in a more abstract way.…”