2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for determining thermal properties of rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noted that with increase in porosity, thermal resistivity increases (R = 0.9). Incidentally, variation of thermal resistivity with respect to porosity was noticed to be consistent with the trends reported in previous works [ 5,23,40,41]. Also the relationship between porosity and thermal diffusivity agrees with [40].…”
Section: Degree Of Saturationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It can be noted that with increase in porosity, thermal resistivity increases (R = 0.9). Incidentally, variation of thermal resistivity with respect to porosity was noticed to be consistent with the trends reported in previous works [ 5,23,40,41]. Also the relationship between porosity and thermal diffusivity agrees with [40].…”
Section: Degree Of Saturationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The particle density was set to ρ = 3.2 × 10 3 kg m −3 , the heat conductivity λ = 1.33 W/m K and the specific heat c s = 1.01 kJ/kg K were taken from the literature (e.g. Krishnaiah et al 2004;Yingwei 2004). The linear heat expansion coefficient is α = 9.4 × 10 −6 K −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krishnaiah et al [13] designed a thermal probe to estimate different thermal properties such as thermal resistivity and diffusivity, and specific heat of rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%