2018
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2017.2786213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology for Efficient Dynamic Spatial Sampling and Reconstruction of Wafer Profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we propose a novel approach to dynamic sampling, called Induced Start Dynamic Sampling (ISDS), that provides a natural extension of greedy selection methods to dynamic sampling, and is able to achievable comparable reconstruction accuracy to the static sampling gold standard. In so doing, it consistently outperform SDS [27], the current state-of-the-art approach for wafer spatial dynamic sampling. To demonstrate the efficacy of the ISDS strategy, it is implemented with the four greedy selection algorithms described above, namely, FSCA, OPFS, ITFS and FP, and the resulting dynamic sampling algorithms benchmarked against other dynamic methods proposed in the literature using both simulated and real industrial case studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we propose a novel approach to dynamic sampling, called Induced Start Dynamic Sampling (ISDS), that provides a natural extension of greedy selection methods to dynamic sampling, and is able to achievable comparable reconstruction accuracy to the static sampling gold standard. In so doing, it consistently outperform SDS [27], the current state-of-the-art approach for wafer spatial dynamic sampling. To demonstrate the efficacy of the ISDS strategy, it is implemented with the four greedy selection algorithms described above, namely, FSCA, OPFS, ITFS and FP, and the resulting dynamic sampling algorithms benchmarked against other dynamic methods proposed in the literature using both simulated and real industrial case studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This can be achieved by using the measured sites as regressors and estimating prediction models for each of the unmeasured sites using the historical data. While linear and nonlinear regression approaches can be employed, linear models have proven to be sufficient in practice [27], and with much lower complexity are the preferred option. Given a set of input values v i ∈ R p×1 , and a target output variable…”
Section: B Linear Regression For Profile Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations