Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2361354.2361365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for evaluating algorithms for table understanding in PDF documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work [1], we proposed a methodology for evaluating these approaches independently from the format of the input and of the output. In particular, the problem of table understanding was split up into three tasks: 1) Many approaches to table understanding, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous work [1], we proposed a methodology for evaluating these approaches independently from the format of the input and of the output. In particular, the problem of table understanding was split up into three tasks: 1) Many approaches to table understanding, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the problem of table understanding was split up into three tasks: 1) Many approaches to table understanding, e.g. [2], [3], have been designed to work on object-based documents as input and therefore cannot be evaluated using datasets consisting solely of page images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many datasets and metrics were proposed to deal with this problem [2-4, 6, 18]. In this paper, we focus on the metric based on text regions (sub-object elements) [1,2,6] which was used to evaluating the results of competitor's algorithms in ICDAR2013 table competition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evaluation profile was first introduced by Silva [2] in 2011 and be used for the performance evaluation of region results (table location-LOC) in ICDAR2013 table competition [1,6]. Firstly, they compare the performance of the method by measuring of completeness and purity of each table region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation