1978
DOI: 10.1115/1.3424225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology for Optimal Sensor Locations for Identification of Dynamic Systems

Abstract: The problem of optimally positioning sensors in lumped and distributed parameter dynamic systems for the purpose of system identification from time-domain input-output data is formulated and a methodology for its solution is presented. A linear relation between small perturbations in a finite-dimensional representation of the system parameters and a finite sample of observations of the system time response is used to determine approximately the covariance of the parameter estimates. The locations of a given nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If i t is assumed that the N measurements inelucled in the vector Y are dependent then by taking the expectation in (3) the Fisher information matrix becomes (18) It is seen from (18) that a N x Ns-dimensional integral has to be solved if the Fisher information matrix is to be estimated directly from the definition which is much more cumbersome than using (17). To see the difference between calculating the Fisher information matrix from (17) and from (18) it is assumed that an observation is taken only once at each measuring point simultaneously.…”
Section: Example: Optimal Location Of Sensors In a Vibrating Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If i t is assumed that the N measurements inelucled in the vector Y are dependent then by taking the expectation in (3) the Fisher information matrix becomes (18) It is seen from (18) that a N x Ns-dimensional integral has to be solved if the Fisher information matrix is to be estimated directly from the definition which is much more cumbersome than using (17). To see the difference between calculating the Fisher information matrix from (17) and from (18) it is assumed that an observation is taken only once at each measuring point simultaneously.…”
Section: Example: Optimal Location Of Sensors In a Vibrating Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step is the optimization of the locations of the sensors [1,2,3,4,5,6] so that the experiments to be committed will be as much informative as possible for the identification of parameters. The minimization of the information entropy is sought in this step, which, based on asymptotic approximations, depends on the differentiation of the quantities to be measured with respect to the parameters to be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, notable contributions to the sensor placement problem for modal identification have been provided by the effective indepen-E dence (EFI) method [8] for uniaxial and triaxial sensors [9,10] . Information theory measures, based on scalar measures of the Fisher information matrix (FIM) [11,12] and on information entropy [13][14][15] , proposed in the past for structural parameter estimation problems, have been extended to be used for modal identification [16] as well. An optimal sensor placement design for modal identification based on FIM was proposed by Kammer [17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%