1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1387-1811(99)00080-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for quantifying sodalite and cancrinite phase mixtures and the kinetics of the sodalite to cancrinite phase transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compositions S3 and S4 contain the three characteristic peaks at 665, 710, and 733 cm -1 associated with the sodalite structure according to the literature. [34,35] As expected, composition S4, stoichiometric match with sodalite, showed the strongest sodalite fingerprint of the four compositions tested. The IR spectrum was also collected for composition S4, which was heat-treated at a temperature of 650 °C and plotted along with specimen heat treated at 850 °C in order to compare the effect of temperature (see Figure 6).…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysis On Alternate Mineral Waste Formssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compositions S3 and S4 contain the three characteristic peaks at 665, 710, and 733 cm -1 associated with the sodalite structure according to the literature. [34,35] As expected, composition S4, stoichiometric match with sodalite, showed the strongest sodalite fingerprint of the four compositions tested. The IR spectrum was also collected for composition S4, which was heat-treated at a temperature of 650 °C and plotted along with specimen heat treated at 850 °C in order to compare the effect of temperature (see Figure 6).…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysis On Alternate Mineral Waste Formssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…[34,35] Sodalite alone is far too absorbing to perform FT-IR analysis without dilution in an IR transparent material (e.g., alkali halide salts). Instead, ~ 4 mg of each sample was mixed with ~ 400 mg of FT-IRgrade KBr and pressed into a pellet at ~ 75 kpsi.…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysis On Alternate Mineral Waste Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that sodalite is not directly precipitated from solution, but that precipitation is reliant upon the dissolution or transformation of another mineral. A similar elevation in activation energy for cancrinite precipitation under Bayer conditions was observed when cancrinite formed from sodalite rather than directly precipitating from solution [54]. Muscovite or quartz could be sources of reactive silica for sodalite precipitation; however, neither were observed to dissolve to an appreciable extent within this study.…”
Section: Reaction Kineticssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Para el caso de una concentración de 3.0M se observan además picos débiles en números de onda correspondientes a 677, 623 y 574 cm -1 , que corresponden a la huella digital de la cancrinita [85].…”
Section: Medio Naohunclassified
“…Las variaciones más apreciables se producen al aumentar el tiempo de tratamiento hasta 12 horas, de forma coherente con los resultados de DRX. Cabe destacar concretamente las vibraciones en 678, 626 y 576 cm -1 debidas a la presencia de cancrinita [85] tras el proceso de 12 horas y la variación de la banda asociada con los grupos carbonato, alrededor de 1460 cm -1 , significativamente más intensa que en los procesos de menor duración. Esta contribución adicional debe corresponder a carbonatos de Ca o de Na amorfos, puesto que no se aprecian mediante DRX.…”
Section: Optimización Del Thunclassified