A methodology for testing virtualisation security

Abstract

There is a growing interest in virtualisation due to its central role in cloud computing, virtual desktop environments and Green IT. Data centres and cloud computing utilise this technology to run multiple operating systems on one physical server, thus reducing hardware costs. However, vulnerabilities in the hypervisor layer have an impact on any virtual machines running on top, making security an important part of virtualisation. In this paper, we evaluate the security of virtualisation, including detection and escaping the environment. We present a methodology to investigate if a virtual machine can be detected and further compromised, based upon previous research. Finally, this methodology is used to evaluate the security of virtual machines. The methods used to evaluate the security include analysis of known vulnerabilities and fuzzing to test the virtual device drivers on three different platforms: VirtualBox, Hyper-V and VMware ESXI. Our results demonstrate that the attack surface of virtualisation is more prone to vulnerabilities than the hypervisor. Comparing our results with previous studies, each platform withstood IOCTL and random fuzzing, demonstrating that the platforms are more robust and secure than previously found. By building on existing research, the results show that security in the hypervisor has been improved. However, using the proposed methodology in this paper it has been shown that an attacker can easily determine that the machine is a virtual machine, which could be used for further exploitation. Finally, our proposed methodology can be utilised to effectively test the security of a virtualised environment.

Automatic Port Scanner

“…In [16] the author reasons to collect all of the required records to comfort the information earlier than real assault consequences of the system, at some point of the port scanning and various sports were completed ultimately where the report could be made to verify the development of the device to be a more secure purpose. In [17] the authors, being able to certify and verify the communication of the security level within a certain device is crucial for his or her acceptance.…”