2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
480
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 868 publications
(493 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
480
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the resilience developments for complex socio-technical systems in other domains, we may identify four key directions for addressing resilience in air transportation. The first is the elaboration of the unifying resilience framework of Francis and Bekera (2014) for the air transportation domain -one of the challenges here is to incorporate the various stakeholders into a unifying framework, with clear links to the SESAR objectives of collaborative decision making (CDM). The second is the further investigation and incorporation of dedicated resilience metrics in air transportation, as discussed in Gluschenko and Foerster (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the resilience developments for complex socio-technical systems in other domains, we may identify four key directions for addressing resilience in air transportation. The first is the elaboration of the unifying resilience framework of Francis and Bekera (2014) for the air transportation domain -one of the challenges here is to incorporate the various stakeholders into a unifying framework, with clear links to the SESAR objectives of collaborative decision making (CDM). The second is the further investigation and incorporation of dedicated resilience metrics in air transportation, as discussed in Gluschenko and Foerster (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a review of the complementary resilience developments in the various domains, Francis and Bekera (2014) identified the following three key capacities of resilience: (i) absorptive capacity, (ii) recoverability, and (iii) adaptive capacity. These key capacities have been integrated into a unifying resilience framework for complex socio-technical systems (ibid.).…”
Section: Defining and Modelling Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is termed the restorative capacity of the system. These ideas are implicitly laid out in Francis andBekera, 2014, andexplicitly in Rose, 2004a. In the disaster literature, the concept of resilience appears to stem from three separate concepts: vulnerability, risk assessment, and adaptive capacity. All of these ideas are linked to a common goal of reducing a community's risk to external forces (Lei et al, 2014).…”
Section: Foundations Of Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the design principles described here are based upon static rather than dynamic measures of resilience. Although many authors have identified the need for such dynamic measures, the literature has yet to produce them [7,9,10,32,45,64,76,90,95]. Therefore, it is likely that the design principles described here will be expanded as the system resilience literature develops further.…”
Section: Design Principles For a Change Of System Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%