2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2014.6943081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metric for self-rightability and understanding its relationship to simple morphologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the energetic requirements for self-righting using symmetric wing opening and to determine whether the robot could self-right quasi-statically or must right dynamically, we utilized a generic planar self-righting analysis framework [43] and its associated self-rightability metric [70]. We approximated the body shape in the sagittal plane as a rectangle and the wing shape in the sagittal plane as a rigid truncated ellipse (Figure 7a).…”
Section: Geometric Model Of the Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand the energetic requirements for self-righting using symmetric wing opening and to determine whether the robot could self-right quasi-statically or must right dynamically, we utilized a generic planar self-righting analysis framework [43] and its associated self-rightability metric [70]. We approximated the body shape in the sagittal plane as a rectangle and the wing shape in the sagittal plane as a rigid truncated ellipse (Figure 7a).…”
Section: Geometric Model Of the Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed systematic experiments to study how winged self-righting performance depends on the speed and magnitude of wing opening, and used a simple dynamic model to understand the falling phase of self-righting. We then applied a planar geometric modeling framework [43,70] to study how the kinematic and energetic requirements for dynamic self-righting depend on wing shape and body/wing mass distribution, and determined whether quasi-static righting is possible for the robot and the discoid cockroach. Finally, inspired by observations from cockroach winged self-righting experiments, we performed robot experiments by using different left and right wing opening to understand whether asymmetric wing opening provides any advantage for self-righting [63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most work has revolved around devising specific solutions for particular systems, either at hardware design level (low center of mass, invertible robots [20]) or defining embodiment specific strategies [21]. The work in [22] is attempting to develop a generalized method for self-righting strategies, by analyzing and exploiting the given robot structure. However, the results are still restricted to small dimensional designs and do not address multi-legged systems (the study focuses on a tracked onearm manipulator).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies have proposed physical models with varying levels of detail ("templates and anchors" (Full and Koditschek 1999)) to determine whether animals meet the mechanical requirements for righting either quasi-statically or dynamically (Kessens et al 2014;Li et al 2016;Kessens and Dotterweich 2017;. To this purpose, we created a detailed 3D rendered model of spotted lanternflies' bodies using photogrammetry and Blender computer graphics software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%