2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microfluidic experiment and pore scale modelling diagnostics for assessing mineral precipitation and dissolution in confined spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Homogeneous nucleation rate (Ri,nuc[0.25emmol/m3normals]) was described by the classical nucleation theory and was implemented in CrunchTope as follows (Li et al., 2017): Ri,nuc=A0J0exp(16πv2α33kB3T3(ln(IAPKsp))2) where A 0 is unity (normalm2/normalm3) and J 0 is the kinetic factor with a value of 1.0 × 10 −8 mol/m 2 s for celestite, which is within the range inferred from the experimental study of Poonoosamy et al. (2019). v is the molecular volume (8.21 × 10 −29 m 3 for celestite), α is the effective interfacial tension (0.092 J/m 2 for celestite, Nielsen & Söhnel, 1971), and k B is the Boltzmann constant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homogeneous nucleation rate (Ri,nuc[0.25emmol/m3normals]) was described by the classical nucleation theory and was implemented in CrunchTope as follows (Li et al., 2017): Ri,nuc=A0J0exp(16πv2α33kB3T3(ln(IAPKsp))2) where A 0 is unity (normalm2/normalm3) and J 0 is the kinetic factor with a value of 1.0 × 10 −8 mol/m 2 s for celestite, which is within the range inferred from the experimental study of Poonoosamy et al. (2019). v is the molecular volume (8.21 × 10 −29 m 3 for celestite), α is the effective interfacial tension (0.092 J/m 2 for celestite, Nielsen & Söhnel, 1971), and k B is the Boltzmann constant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“… The data are from *Nielsen & Söhnel (1971), **Poonoosamy et al. (2019), ***Marty et al. (2015), and **** Palandri (2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires further investigation as it has important implications for predicting natural weathering processes, scaling in the subsurface energy production systems, cement degradation, and glass corrosion among others. The combination of pores scale modelling and microstructural information is a versatile tool to investigate these phenomena [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic techniques can regulate fluid flows with micron‐scale precision and hence provide a unique opportunity to study geochemical processes associated with heterogeneous flow and transport in reactive geologic porous media at the pore scale. However, most microfluidic experiments have focused on reactions that are driven by externally injected chemicals because typical microdevices are fabricated in nonreactive substrates such as silicon, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), or glass slides (De Anna et al, 2014; Poonoosamy et al, 2019; Qi et al, 2018; Willingham et al, 2008; Yoon et al, 2012). Recent works have extended the use of microfluidic techniques to reactive environments relevant to Earth science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%