2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microfluidic platform towards automated multiplexed in situ sequencing

Abstract: Advancements in multiplexed in situ RNA profiling techniques have given unprecedented insight into spatial organization of tissues by enabling single-molecule quantification and sub-micron localization of dozens to thousands of RNA species simultaneously in cells and entire tissue sections. However, the lack of automation of the associated complex experimental procedures represents a potential hurdle towards their routine use in laboratories. Here, we demonstrate an approach towards auto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In situ spatial detection methods are very suitable for regional validation of target genes in a cellspecific manner. ISS by CARTANA (Ke et al, 2013;Maïno et al, 2019) is a very promising and easy-to-use methodology, where individual genes are targeted by barcoded padlock probes, which is a more sensitive methodology compared to unbiased in situ approaches including FISSEQ (Lee et al, 2015). More specifically, the sensitivity of ST (7%), ISS (10%), and FISSEQ (0,005%) are all lower compared to single-cell or single-nuclei sequencing (20%).…”
Section: Discussion: Comparison Of Transcriptomics Spatial Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ spatial detection methods are very suitable for regional validation of target genes in a cellspecific manner. ISS by CARTANA (Ke et al, 2013;Maïno et al, 2019) is a very promising and easy-to-use methodology, where individual genes are targeted by barcoded padlock probes, which is a more sensitive methodology compared to unbiased in situ approaches including FISSEQ (Lee et al, 2015). More specifically, the sensitivity of ST (7%), ISS (10%), and FISSEQ (0,005%) are all lower compared to single-cell or single-nuclei sequencing (20%).…”
Section: Discussion: Comparison Of Transcriptomics Spatial Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] A couple of years later, in 2019, the ISS assay was automated on a microfluidic platform, significantly reducing hands-on time as well as the total protocol runtime. [33] A further development dubbed "HybISS" replaces SBL of RCPs with sequencing-by-hybridization (SBH). This method demonstrates significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio than the SBL counterpart and is thought to allow for larger gene panels.…”
Section: In Situ Sequencing Using Padlock Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying further advancements that have been incorporated, at least in part, to other spatial techniques to HybISS are currently being pursued to try to push the capabilities of the technology. This could be in the form of microfluidic devices to automate production ( 36 ), reducing time, or investigating how these cells are actually arranged in a three-dimensional space and not simply sequential sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%