2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A micromechanical fracture criterion accounting for in-plane and out-of-plane constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the actual engineering structures, both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints are generally existed. To describe the interaction between in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints and the overall level of constraints, a unified measure of constraint that is sensitive consistently to both is required 6,7 . However, the constraint parameters T , Q , A 2 , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the actual engineering structures, both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints are generally existed. To describe the interaction between in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints and the overall level of constraints, a unified measure of constraint that is sensitive consistently to both is required 6,7 . However, the constraint parameters T , Q , A 2 , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may not be sensitive equally to both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints. Mostafavi et al 7–10 have suggested a unified constraint parameter ϕ that was defined as the size of the plastic region at the onset of fracture normalised by the plastic region size of a standard test: where A c is the plastic region area at fracture and A ssy is the reference plastic region area at fracture for a standard specimen in plane strain condition. They argued that both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints have a similar effect on the plastic region size at fracture, and the parameter ϕ is equally sensitive to in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the parameters mentioned previously are not equally sensitive to both constraints which exist in the engineering structures . So, a unified measure parameter of constraint which is equally sensitive to both is required …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them focus on a point of damage initiation in the first ligament. In many cases (Aravas and McMeeking 1985a;Baaser and Gross 2003;Dahlberg 2004;Gao et al 2005;Hom and McMeeking 1989;Mostafavi et al 2011) a post-processing criterion was applied to obtain this point defined as critical. Tvergaard and Hutchinson (Tvergaard 2007;Tvergaard and Hutchinson 2002), Kim et al (2003) and Petti and Dodds (2005) employed a node-release technique to trace the crack growth after having fulfilled such a criterion.…”
Section: Micro-mechanical Models Of Ductile Crack Initiation and Propmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dahlberg (2004), Gu (2000), Tvergaard and Niordson (2008) as well as Gao et al (2005) and Kim et al (2003) resolved up to six discrete voids in the crack plane in front of the crack tip and found an influence of the shape of the voids, of an additionally added second row of voids, of the crack tip constraint and of strain gradient hardening. Petti and Dodds (2005), Tvergaard (2007) and Mostafavi et al (2011) incorporated up to 30 discrete voids in a single row in front of the crack tip. Gao et al (2005), Kim et al (2003), Petti and Dodds (2005), Tvergaard (2007), Tvergaard and Hutchinson (2002) defined a critical value of the ligament reduction ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%